Thursday, January 15, 2009 (Sex, photos, icons)
Posted in interweb
I was surprised to find the NatGeo photo winners to be really weak – but then I switched the dropdown to “english edition winners” (you can’t link to it!) and those absolutely blew my mind. Kinda strange contrast…
I’m into #’s 3, 5 and 6 of the Worldwide Winners (can’t link to those either), but I agree, the “english winners” are by far the stronger photographs.
Name (required)
email (required, will not be published)
Website
HTML allowed: <a href=""> <strong> <em> <code>
<a href=""> <strong> <em> <code>
Powered by WordPress using the Minimal, Really Theme. Inspired by Things
Bill Keller's Links on Delicious HREF Treasure Trove:
Items of Note:
CSS Tutorials:
foxxyz #
I was surprised to find the NatGeo photo winners to be really weak – but then I switched the dropdown to “english edition winners” (you can’t link to it!) and those absolutely blew my mind. Kinda strange contrast…
Bill Keller #
I’m into #’s 3, 5 and 6 of the Worldwide Winners (can’t link to those either), but I agree, the “english winners” are by far the stronger photographs.