<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Great Walls of Garbage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ghettocooler.net/2009/10/15/great-walls-of-garbage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ghettocooler.net/2009/10/15/great-walls-of-garbage/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 19:44:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: metal</title>
		<link>http://ghettocooler.net/2009/10/15/great-walls-of-garbage/comment-page-1/#comment-52064</link>
		<dc:creator>metal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 21:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ghettocooler.net/?p=1791#comment-52064</guid>
		<description>i agree Bill. I read that Wired article, and my first thought was...do they realize how much stupid shit is already flooding FaceBook? While their user base grows, the quality of content lessens, and that user base is less likely to log in, unless it&#039;s just to check their messages/post a status udpate, which is really what we&#039;re trained to do with it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree Bill. I read that Wired article, and my first thought was&#8230;do they realize how much stupid shit is already flooding FaceBook? While their user base grows, the quality of content lessens, and that user base is less likely to log in, unless it&#8217;s just to check their messages/post a status udpate, which is really what we&#8217;re trained to do with it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ghettocooler.net &#187; Facebooks walled garden is increasingly less relevant</title>
		<link>http://ghettocooler.net/2009/10/15/great-walls-of-garbage/comment-page-1/#comment-51985</link>
		<dc:creator>ghettocooler.net &#187; Facebooks walled garden is increasingly less relevant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ghettocooler.net/?p=1791#comment-51985</guid>
		<description>[...] I mentioned Facebooks great walls are holding back garbage, with regards to a must read Wired article titled Great Wall of Facebook: The Social Network’s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I mentioned Facebooks great walls are holding back garbage, with regards to a must read Wired article titled Great Wall of Facebook: The Social Network’s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill</title>
		<link>http://ghettocooler.net/2009/10/15/great-walls-of-garbage/comment-page-1/#comment-51984</link>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ghettocooler.net/?p=1791#comment-51984</guid>
		<description>Naturally, Google is really offering the goods when it comes to utilizing your online (&amp; offline) network for search: &lt;a href=&quot;http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2009/10/google-social-search.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2009/10/google-social-search.html&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Naturally, Google is really offering the goods when it comes to utilizing your online (&amp; offline) network for search: <a href="http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2009/10/google-social-search.html" rel="nofollow">http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2009/10/google-social-search.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cpawl</title>
		<link>http://ghettocooler.net/2009/10/15/great-walls-of-garbage/comment-page-1/#comment-51975</link>
		<dc:creator>cpawl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ghettocooler.net/?p=1791#comment-51975</guid>
		<description>http://www.wowd.com/index.jsp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.wowd.com/index.jsp" rel="nofollow">http://www.wowd.com/index.jsp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Keller</title>
		<link>http://ghettocooler.net/2009/10/15/great-walls-of-garbage/comment-page-1/#comment-51955</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Keller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 12:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ghettocooler.net/?p=1791#comment-51955</guid>
		<description>Thanks Cpawl. The future is now, we&#039;re living in it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Cpawl. The future is now, we&#8217;re living in it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cpawl</title>
		<link>http://ghettocooler.net/2009/10/15/great-walls-of-garbage/comment-page-1/#comment-51952</link>
		<dc:creator>cpawl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 19:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ghettocooler.net/?p=1791#comment-51952</guid>
		<description>The future of search most assuredly involves your network of friends, family &amp; peers

I don&#039;t even think this much is true.  The power of the web is the massive amounts of available resources.  The future of search should be rather a way to narrow the results into relevancy more accurately.  Facebook, bookmark site&#039;s like delicious, and things like me coming and commenting here is already the network of friends, family, and peers.  If anything there needs to be an aggregator where people can group resources they trust and search within those boundaries.  For instance I can say I trust anything on the web by: THESE PEOPLE, THESE COMMUNITIES, THESE SITES, ...etc. and search within them first - first being important here - the open web results should be secondary at least.  

There will be no one size fits all solution not for Facebook or even for Google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The future of search most assuredly involves your network of friends, family &amp; peers</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t even think this much is true.  The power of the web is the massive amounts of available resources.  The future of search should be rather a way to narrow the results into relevancy more accurately.  Facebook, bookmark site&#8217;s like delicious, and things like me coming and commenting here is already the network of friends, family, and peers.  If anything there needs to be an aggregator where people can group resources they trust and search within those boundaries.  For instance I can say I trust anything on the web by: THESE PEOPLE, THESE COMMUNITIES, THESE SITES, &#8230;etc. and search within them first &#8211; first being important here &#8211; the open web results should be secondary at least.  </p>
<p>There will be no one size fits all solution not for Facebook or even for Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

